Homepage
New Abolitionist
Case Fact Sheets
Event Calendar
Get Involved!
Related Links
Search

The New Abolitionist
September 2003, Issue 29

A new step forward U.S. Supreme Court decision on incompetent attorneys

North Carolina Senate passes halt on executions: Momentum for a moratorium

Death Penalty Awareness Week

Mother, friend, abolitionist: A tribute to Costella Cannon

Puerto Rico makes it clear to Bush: We don't want the death penalty

A mother tells of her son's fight

Highlights of the Struggle: Reports from Campaign chapters around the country

Voices from the Inside

The National Convention of the Campaign to End the Death Penalty

Capital Punishment as Suicide: The case of Daniel Colwell

Meet the Death Row 10: Grayland Johson "My focus is freedom"

Judge defends the rights of 9/11 Suspect

A step forward, but we still have a way to go Keeping it real by pardoned Illinois death row prisoner Stanley Howard

Final report on the Campaign fund drive

Black, poor and innocent on death row Attorney George Kendall on the case of Delma Banks

Death Camp on Guantanomo?


Archive Issues of The New Abolitionist

Judge defends the rights of 9/11 suspect

By Mike Stark

Federal prosecutors' efforts to seek the death penalty against accused September 11th conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui were dealt a setback when federal Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that Moussaoui has the right to interview suspected al-Qaeda member Ramzi bin al-Shibh, held by the U.S. government in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The government has since refused to allow Moussaoui access to bin al-Shibh, citing national security concerns, and it has hinted that it may simply drop charges against Moussaoui and transfer him to a military tribunal. If Moussaoui is transferred to a military tribunal it, will be yet another example of how the Bush administration runs roughshod over the constitution in pursuing its war on terrorism. The Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant's right to call and interview witnesses for the defense.

Some have argued that the government wanted Moussaoui tried before a military tribunal all along, and Brinkema's ruling played into prosecutors' hands. This argument ignores how Ashcroft and the Bush administration have made a project of bending civilian courts to their will under the guise of the war on terror. From its illegal detention of thousands of immigrants to its use of anti-terror laws to seek the death penalty against sniper suspect John Muhammad, Ashcroft has attempted to redefine civil rights in the post-9/11 era. Brinkema's ruling was a blow to these efforts.

But the battle against the executions of those accused of terrorist activities is just beginning. We must build a movement to ensure that the "murky intelligence" used invade Iraq isn't used to execute suspects in military tribunals in camp X-Ray at Guantanamo Bay.

 

The New Abolitionist - September 2003, Issue 29
Campaign To End The Death Penalty, Chicago, IL - www.nodeathpenalty.org


Homepage | New Abolitionist | CEDP Fact Sheets
Event Calendar | Get Involved! | Links | Search